Pressed by author
David Remnick on the comparison, Obama said he thinks marijuana is less
dangerous “in terms of its impact on the individual consumer.” But he
added, “it’s not something I encourage, and I’ve told my daughters I think it’s
a bad idea, a waste of time, not very healthy.”
Obama also told
Remnick that he is troubled that “middle-class kids don’t get locked up for
smoking pot, and poor kids do. And African-American kids and Latino kids are
more likely to be poor and less likely to have the resources and the support to
avoid unduly harsh penalties.”
He did caution that
the movement for legalization of marijuana raises “some difficult line-drawing
issues. If marijuana is fully legalized and at some point folks say, ‘Well, we
can come up with a negotiated dose of cocaine that we can show is not any more
harmful than vodka,’ are we open to that? If somebody says, ‘We’ve got a finely
calibrated dose of meth, it isn’t going to kill you or rot your teeth,’ are we
OK with that?”
“Those who argue
that legalizing marijuana is a panacea and it solves all these social problems
I think are probably overstating the case,” he said “There is a lot of
hair on that policy. And the experiment that’s going to be taking place in
Colorado and Washington is going to be, I think, a challenge.”
The president also
weighed in on the dangers of playing football, saying that professional players
“know what they’re buying into” when they play the sport and risk concussions
and brain damage.
When asked whether
he felt “at all ambivalent about following” professional football, Obama
responded by saying, “I would not let my son play pro football.” He added,
“but, I mean, you (Remnick) wrote a lot about boxing, right? We’re sort of in
the same realm.”
“At this point,
there’s a little bit of caveat emptor,” Obama said. “These guys, they know what
they’re doing. They know what they’re buying into. It is no longer a secret.
It’s sort of the feeling I have about smokers, you know?”
In the piece, Obama
also comments on the role he believes racial prejudice plays in American
politics.
“There’s no doubt
that there’s some folks who just really dislike me because they don’t like the
idea of a black President,” he said. “Now, the flip side of it is there are
some black folks and maybe some white folks who really like me and give me the
benefit of the doubt precisely because I’m a black President.”
He also argues that
conservatives’ preference for policies being decided by state governments can’t
be separated from the intertwined history of states’ rights and slavery in the
years leading to the Civil War and racial prejudice since then.
“You can be somebody
who, for very legitimate reasons, worries about the power of the federal
government—that it’s distant, that it’s bureaucratic, that it’s not
accountable—and as a consequence you think that more power should reside in the
hands of state governments,” he said.
But Obama said “that
philosophy is wrapped up in the history of states’ rights in the context of the
civil-rights movement and the Civil War and (South Carolina Sen. John C.)
Calhoun. There’s a pretty long history there.”
He urged
progressives to not “dismiss out of hand arguments against my Presidency or the
Democratic Party or Bill Clinton or anybody just because there’s some overlap
between those criticisms and the criticisms that traditionally were directed
against those who were trying to bring about greater equality for
African-Americans.”
On the other hand,
he said conservatives should see that “if I am concerned about leaving it up to
states to expand Medicaid that it may not simply be because I am this
power-hungry guy in Washington who wants to crush states’ rights but, rather,
because we are one country and I think it is going to be important for the
entire country to make sure that poor folks in Mississippi and not just
Massachusetts are healthy.”
No comments:
Post a Comment